The next frontier: Structural biology
Mapping the internal architecture
of proteins
by Darla Brown
When the human genome was mapped, it
opened up a new world to researchers by revealing man’s
genetic code. Now, scientists say, the next frontier
will be to understand the structure of the proteins
that are encoded by the genes.
Structural biologists study and reveal
the mechanisms by which cellular components carry out
their processes. By isolating individual proteins and
projecting them into 3-D graphic displays, drugs can
be designed to target specific cellular functions.
“Disease is simply the result
of cells and molecules doing things they are not supposed
to do. So if we can understand the structure of the
abnormal molecules, we may be able to intervene and
help,” says Rodney Kellems, Ph.D., chairman of
the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
“It’s not unlike the work
of a car mechanic,” he continues. “If your
car breaks down, someone is able to fix it because they
know the structure of the parts and how they function–
structural biologists seek to understand the structure
of the body at the cellular and molecular levels. This
detailed structural information brings reality to the
term ‘molecular medicine’ and will ultimately
provide therapeutic options for the treatment of disease.”
Structural biology is not a new focus
at the Medical School. There is already a Structural
Biology Research Center, which is housed in the Department
of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. There is also
a Center for Membrane Biology, a part of the Department
of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, which has a strong
focus on the structure of membrane proteins.
“With the spotlight on structural
biology, we hope to hire a significant number of new
faculty who will be members of either center,”
Dr. Kellems says.
A great strength of the School’s
structural biology program lies in the expertise in
all three primary types of technology used by scientists
to determine the structure of proteins: nuclear magnetic
resonance spectroscopy (NMR), X-ray crystallography,
and cryo-electron microscopy.
“All three approaches give us
tremendous detail in atomic resolution, and in the context
of medicine, this information can be very valuable.
It can provide us important opportunities for developing
structure-based drug design to combat diseases,”
Dr. Kellems says.
“These methods give you different
information, but they complement each other,”
says John Putkey, Ph.D., professor of biochemistry and
molecular biology. “We are in a unique position
to capitalize on findings and collaborations due to
the fact that we have expertise in all three technologies.”
With electron microscopy, scientists
are able to look at large molecular complexes, such
as a whole virus. In favorable cases, high resolution
electron microscopy can resolve individual atoms.
|

|
 |
| Technology
allows researches to discern the structure of proteins
and project them into 3-D models. |
“Three dimensional cryo-electron
microscopy is a rapidly developing area of molecular
imaging, and we have considerable research strength
in this important area,” Dr. Kellems says.
X-ray diffraction allows scientists
to study the structure of proteins that have been crystallized.
“Protein crystallographers benefit
from access to a high-energy beam line that allows them
to collect high-resolution X-ray diffraction data from
their proteins. We are members of a beam line consortium
at the Berkeley Synchrotron, a facility that allows
our crystallographers to obtain protein structures at
atomic resolution very quickly,” Dr. Kellems says.
“Currently our scientists take their proteins
crystals to the beam line at Berkele– in a few
years we expect to be able to ship proteins to the beam
and view collected data in real time over the Internet.”
With NMR spectroscopy, proteins may
be studied in their native state in solution and in
motion.
“Structure determines function,”
says Sudha Veeraraghavan, Ph.D., assistant professor
of biochemistry and molecular biology. “Determining
the structural model gives us a visual insight into
how we can modify the function and determine drug design.
NMR and crystallography are complimentary high resolution
methods that precisely describe the positions of atoms
or nuclei in a molecule and help solve the puzzle of
how function is determined by structure.”
“If you can’t get the protein
to crystallize, you can get 3-D information from it
via NMR, and modify it in solution to see how it interacts,”
Dr. Putkey adds.
In recent years, there has been an
increase effort at the national level in furthering
this research.
“There is emphasis on membrane
protein structures in the National Institutes of Health
roadmap initiative because of the large numbers of biomedically
important receptors, channels and pumps - nearly 30%
of the human proteome consists of membrane proteins,”
says John Spudich, Ph.D., director of the Center for
Membrane Biology.
The Medical School plays a major role
in the field not only in the Texas Medical Center but
in the surrounding Houston area as a member of the Gulf
Coast Consortia for Membrane Biology and for Structural
Biology, which includes Rice University, The University
of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, the University
of Houston, The University of Texas Medical Branch,
and Baylor College of Medicine.
“There are not many places that
have such organized centers and strengths in membrane
structural biology as we do here at the Medical School,
so we are well positioned to attract the best young
scientists to build on our expertise,” Dr. Spudich
adds.
With expertise on hand and the promise
to add more faculty and space, the Medical School is
poised to become an international leader in this burgeoning
field.
“There are exciting new
developments in membrane protein crystallization, and
we’re playing a role in developing that much needed
technology. Structural biology is one of the most promising
new frontiers in biomedical research,” Dr. Spudich
says.
|